Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[Download] "How to Comply with Chapter 558 Florida Statutes: Current Challenges and Future Changes" by Florida Bar Journal # eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

How to Comply with Chapter 558 Florida Statutes: Current Challenges and Future Changes

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: How to Comply with Chapter 558 Florida Statutes: Current Challenges and Future Changes
  • Author : Florida Bar Journal
  • Release Date : January 01, 2009
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 80 KB

Description

F.S. Ch. 558, otherwise known as the Florida Construction Defect Statute, requires owners to send a "notice of claim" to developers, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and/or design professionals identifying any alleged construction and/or design defects in "reasonable detail" before any litigation or arbitration for construction defects may be initiated. (1) In other words, before an owner may sue someone for a defect, a very specific set of rules must be followed or legal rights may be delayed or lost. Since the introduction of Ch. 558 in 2003, participating parties to design and construction along with construction lawyers, courts, and arbitrators have wrestled with how to inject practicality into the process. Recently reported episodes prove convincing that some change is necessary. In one unreported decision, a circuit court judge interpreted a secondary notice sent to a subcontractor as an admission of liability against a developer. (2) In another case, a federal trial court declined to dismiss or abate for failure of a claimant to serve the notice of claim. (3) Instead, the court allowed the case to proceed but required the parties to comply with the procedures of Ch. 558 during the early stages of litigation. (4) In a landscape of uncertainty surrounding various provisions, only four appellate decisions exist, none of which have addressed substantive issues that frequently cause construction practitioners heartburn when unsettled issues arise during this presuit process. (5) More decisions challenging the various provisions will likely be on the horizon because in 2006, the Florida Legislature expanded the statute to apply beyond residential dwellings to commercial real property, such as businesses, schools, hospitals, office condominiums, hotels, and all other structures except for those involving public transportation. (6) As businesses struggle to stay afloat in this economy, many cannot afford to interrupt the daily routine to allow parties to herd inspectors through the structures, during normal working hours, to ponder repairs to be performed at a later date. Business owners may be hard-pressed to hold off fixing their leaking roof for a period of 45 days to enable a contractor to respond with an offer to fix the leak. The statute does provide some express relief from compliance if the repairs performed constitute an "emergency."7 Although this term is not defined under the statute except to describe a repair to "protect the health, safety, and welfare of the claimant," a judge may be hard-pressed to understand why an unsightly condition in a business setting such as a restaurant gives rise to an emergency situation to relieve the business owner from following the statute. The result of all of these developments will create challenges to be sorted out by lawyers and fact finders. Many of these issues may also stall repairs being made, with some business owners electing to ignore the statute only to be later delayed from pursuing relief against responsible parties. (8)


Free Books Download "How to Comply with Chapter 558 Florida Statutes: Current Challenges and Future Changes" PDF ePub Kindle